ArticleScientific reports2025
An effective microscopic image augmentation approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and Implementation of a Defect Detection Model for Microstructures Using Image Processing Methods.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There are too many types of Chinese medicinal herbs (CMH) and it is difficult to collect microscopic images, which naturally leads to the problem of small sample size. In addition, CMH also has some scarcity characteristic, with the proportion of certain cells as low as 0.5%. This leads to the failure of deep learning models, and even few-shot learning methods are difficult to solve effectively. Expanding the data scale of rare features is one of the effective strategies. To address this challenge, we propose an effective microscopic image augmentation approach for few-shot learning (MIAA-FSL). The approach consists of two aspects: first, we design the conditionally guided microscopic image generation model (CGMIGM), which combines the denoising diffusion probabilistic models (DDPM) based conditional guidance technique to efficiently generate rare features and thus alleviate the class imbalance problem. Second, we introduce the semi-supervised learning data augmentation model (SSLDAM), which integrates semi-supervised image processing and pseudo-label generation techniques to effectively overcome the issues of damage, blurriness, and difficulty in discernment in microscopic images, making otherwise unusable images usable. The experimental results show that the MIAA-FSL improves the identification accuracy by 24% on average compared with the Microscope Image Recognition + DDPM (MIR+DDPM) approach, especially in the identification of rare features, the accuracy is significantly improved from 45.5% to 87.0%, which effectively mitigates the problem of object detection with few samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.