ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning prediction of preterm birth in women under 35 using routine biomarkers in a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning to predict adverse perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based risk assessment of neonatal perinatal adverse outcomes of anemia during pregnancy: a modeling study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Comparative machine learning models for early prediction of preterm birth from maternal serum biomarkers.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for predicting and preventing adverse pregnancy outcomes addressing bias and clinical translation.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- A machine learning-based risk prediction model for early preterm birth: development and prospective validation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Blood-based predictive biomarkers for preterm birth: Redefining risk stratification in modern perinatal care.Tzu chi medical journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Preterm birth (PTB), defined as delivery before 37 weeks, affects 15 million infants annually, accounting for 11% of live births and over 35% of neonatal deaths. While advanced maternal age (≥ 35 years) is a known risk factor, PTB risk in women under 35 is underexplored. This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based model for PTB prediction in women under 35. A retrospective cohort of 2606 cases (2019-2022) equally split between full-term and preterm births was analyzed. Logistic Regression, LightGBM, Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), and XGBoost models were evaluated. External validation was conducted using 803 independent cases (2023). Model performance was assessed using area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values were used to interpret model predictions. The XGBoost model demonstrated superior performance with an AUC of 0.893 (95% CI: 0.860-0.925) on the validation set. In comparison, Logistic Regression, LightGBM, and GBDT achieved AUCs of 0.872, 0.840, and 0.879, respectively. External validation of the XGBoost model yielded an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.889-0.931). SHAP analysis highlighted seven key predictors: alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), hemoglobin (HGB), urea (UREA), lymphocyte count (Lym1), sodium (Na), and red cell distribution width coefficient of variation (RDWCV). The XGBoost model provides accurate PTB risk prediction and key insights for early intervention in women under 35, supporting its potential clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.