ArticleScientific reports2025
A relative analysis to cascaded fractional-order controllers in microgrid non-minimum phase converters using EHO.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A passivity based nonlinear controller for hybrid DC microgrid with constant power loads.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microgrids integrate various distributed energy resources to enhance energy reliability and sustainability. Power electronic converters are vital in microgrids since they provide efficient, reliable, and flexible operation. There are numerous controllers available that can be applied to these converters, and lately, fractional-order controllers (FOC) have gathered huge recognition. These controllers provide enhanced flexibility and superior performance in managing dynamic behavior. There are various structures of FOCs, and this article predominantly focuses on comparing different cascaded fractional order controllers (C-FOC). Four distinct topologies of cascaded fractional order proportional integral (C-FOPI) controllers are selected for comparison with one another and with the cascaded proportional integral controller used in a non-minimum phase converter, such as the boost converter employed in a microgrid system. The controllers are optimized using the Elephant Herd Optimization (EHO) algorithm with the Integral of Time-weighted Absolute Error (ITAE) serving as the performance metric. Each controller is subject to variation in system changes, and the outcomes are documented and correlated to ascertain the optimum structure. The simulation outcomes endorsed notable advancements in terms of transient and steady-state performance, featuring improved resilience to parameter changes, a reduction of 36.6% in settling time, 15% in overshoot, 20.1% in rise time, an improved phase margin of more than 51% and more than 50% reduction in performance indices compared to traditional cascaded proportional integral controllers (PI-PI).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.