ArticleScientific reports2025
Large scale summarization using ensemble prompts and in context learning approaches.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Generating reliable software project task flows using large language models through prompt engineering and robust evaluation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The field of Information Assurance (IA) and Cybersecurity has seen substantial evolution, driven by advancements in technology and the increasing sophistication of threats in the digital age. This study employs Large Language Models (LLMs), as well as other advanced NLP techniques, to conduct a comprehensive analysis of literature from 1967 to 2024. By analyzing a corpus of more than 62,000 documents extracted from Scopus, our approach involves a comprehensive methodology that includes two main phases: topic detection using BERTopic and automatic summarization with LLMs across various periods (annual and decades). By designing targeted queries to extract relevant papers, analyzing textual data, and applying advanced prompting techniques for summarization, we integrate computational models to handle large volumes of data. Our results demonstrate that an ensemble of methods (Ev2) outperforms traditional summarization and density-based approaches, with improvements ranging from 16.7% to 29.6% in keyword definition tasks. It generates summaries that outperform in 5 out of the 7 tested metrics while maintaining the logical integrity of bibliographic references. Our results illuminate the shifts in focus within Information Assurance across decades, revealing key breakthroughs and forecasting emerging areas of significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.