Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40133382›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Large scale summarization using ensemble prompts and in context learning approaches.

Andrés Leiva-Araos, Bady Gana, Héctor Allende-Cid, José García, Manob Jyoti Saikia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrés Leiva-AraosDepartment of Computing, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2480-3022
Bady GanaEscuela de Ingeniería Informática, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, 2340000, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9840-0586
Héctor Allende-CidEscuela de Ingeniería Informática, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, 2340000, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3047-8817
José GarcíaEscuela de Ingeniería en Construcción y Transporte, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, 2362804, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3126-8352
Manob Jyoti SaikiaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA. msaikia@memphis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6656-4333

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of Information Assurance (IA) and Cybersecurity has seen substantial evolution, driven by advancements in technology and the increasing sophistication of threats in the digital age. This study employs Large Language Models (LLMs), as well as other advanced NLP techniques, to conduct a comprehensive analysis of literature from 1967 to 2024. By analyzing a corpus of more than 62,000 documents extracted from Scopus, our approach involves a comprehensive methodology that includes two main phases: topic detection using BERTopic and automatic summarization with LLMs across various periods (annual and decades). By designing targeted queries to extract relevant papers, analyzing textual data, and applying advanced prompting techniques for summarization, we integrate computational models to handle large volumes of data. Our results demonstrate that an ensemble of methods (Ev2) outperforms traditional summarization and density-based approaches, with improvements ranging from 16.7% to 29.6% in keyword definition tasks. It generates summaries that outperform in 5 out of the 7 tested metrics while maintaining the logical integrity of bibliographic references. Our results illuminate the shifts in focus within Information Assurance across decades, revealing key breakthroughs and forecasting emerging areas of significance.

Indexed as

Automatic summarizationCybersecurity trendsInformation assuranceLarge language modelsNatural language processing (NLP)Systematic topic review

Identifiers

PMID40133382
PMCPMC11937410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.