Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40133355›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Assessing differential application of thromboprophylaxis regimes related to risk of pulmonary embolism and mortality in COVID-19 patients through instrumental variable analysis.

Linda Nab, Chantal Visser, Bas C T van Bussel, Albertus Beishuizen, Remy H H Bemelmans, Hugo Ten Cate, F Nanne Croles, Coen van Guldener, C Peter C de Jager, Menno V Huisman and 17 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Linda Nab *Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Chantal Visser *Department of Haematology, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Bas C T van BusselDepartment of Intensive Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Albertus BeishuizenDepartment of Intensive Care, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Remy H H BemelmansDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands.
Hugo Ten CateCardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
F Nanne CrolesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital St. Jansdal, Harderwijk, The Netherlands.
Coen van GuldenerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
C Peter C de JagerDepartment of Intensive Care, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Menno V HuismanDepartment of Medicine - Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marten R NijzielDepartment of Haematology-Oncology, Catherina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Pieter W KamphuisenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tergooi Medical Center, Hilversum, The Netherlands.
Frederikus A KlokDepartment of Medicine - Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Stephanie C E KosterDepartment of Intensive Care, Zaans Medical Centre, Zaandam, The Netherlands.
Nuray KuşadasiDepartment of Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Karina MeijerDepartment of Haematology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Corstiaan A den UilDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Roger E G SchutgensCentre for Benign Haematology, Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Van Creveldkliniek, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Frank StamDepartment of Internal Medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Alexander P J VlaarDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eline A VlotDepartment of Intensive Care, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marijke P M LinschotenDepartment of Cardiology, Division of Heart and Lungs, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Folkert W AsselbergsDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marieke J H A KruipDepartment of Haematology, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Saskia le CessieDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Suzanne C CannegieterDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. S.C.Cannegieter@lumc.nl.
Dutch Covid and Thrombosis Coalition & the CAPACITY-COVID collaborative consortium

Funding

Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development project number 10430012010004the Dutch Heart Foundation 2020B006 CAPACITYTrombosestichting Nederland 2020_A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thrombotic complications are common in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, with pulmonary embolism (PE) being the most frequent. Randomised trials have provided inconclusive results on the optimal dosage of thromboprophylaxis in critically ill COVID-19 patients. We utilized data from the multicentre CAPACITY-COVID patient registry to assess the effect of differential application of Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) dose protocols on PE and in-hospital mortality risk in critically ill COVID-19 patients. An instrumental variable analysis was performed to estimate the intention-to-treat effect, utilizing differences in thromboprophylaxis prescribing behaviour between hospitals. We included 939 patients with PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection from 34 hospitals. Two-hundred-and-one patients (21%) developed a PE. The adjusted cause-specific HR of PE was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.73-1.16) per doubling of LMWH dose. The adjusted cause-specific HR for in-hospital mortality was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.65-1.02) per doubling of LMWH dose. This dose-response relationship was shown to be non-linear. To conclude, this study did not find evidence for an effect of LMWH dose on the risk of PE, but suggested a non-linear decreased risk of in-hospital mortality for higher doses of LMWH. However, uncertainty remains, and the dose-response relationship between LMWH dose and in-hospital mortality needs further investigation in well-designed studies.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsCOVID-19Heparin, Low-Molecular-WeightPulmonary EmbolismAgedFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2AnticoagulantsHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightCOVID-19Dose–response relationshipDrugHeparinHospital mortalityLow-molecular-weightPulmonary embolism

Identifiers

PMID40133355
PMCPMC11937556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.