ArticleScientific reports2025
Exploring the driving mechanism path of ecosystem service relationships based on the social-ecological system framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the driving mechanisms behind ecosystem service (ES) trade-offs and synergies is crucial for sustainable ecosystem management. This study integrates the Social-Ecological System Framework (SESF) with path analysis to explore the relationships among crop production (CP), water retention (WR), and soil conservation (SC) in Shanxi Province, China. We identified six key driving factors-annual mean temperature (Tem), total annual precipitation (Pre), Net Primary Productivity (NPP), per capita GDP (GDP), agricultural, forestry, and water fiscal expenditure (Exp), and urban and rural per capita disposable income (Inc)-to analyze their direct and indirect influences on ES interactions over the years 2000, 2010, and 2020. Results show that CP and WR exhibit a persistent trade-off, while CP and SC maintain a synergistic relationship. WR and SC display a trade-off in static time points but shift towards synergy in long-term changes. Path analysis confirms that natural factors (Tem, Pre, and NPP) dominate short-term ES dynamics, whereas socio-economic variables (GDP, Exp, and Inc) play a greater role in long-term ES changes. Mediation analysis reveals that NPP partially mediates climate effects on ESs, while Inc mediates the influence of GDP on ESs. However, Exp does not significantly affect ESs through Inc, likely due to policy implementation delays and regional economic priorities. Findings suggest that spatially targeted policies should be implemented to optimize ES relationships. Long-term ES governance should integrate ecological restoration strategies with socio-economic incentives to enhance ES sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.