Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40133329›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Natural infection of Trypanosoma Cruzi in client-owned-dogs from rural Yucatan, Mexico.

Jorge Andrés Calderón-Quintal, Maryrose José Escalante-Talavera, Christian Florian Teh-Poot, María Noe Carrera-Campellone, Pedro Pablo Martinez-Vega, Victor Manuel Dzul-Huchim, Landy Magaly Pech-Pisté, Etienne B Waleckx, Liliana Estefanía Villanueva-Lizama, Jaime Ortega-Lopez and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Research square · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jorge Andrés Calderón-QuintalLaboratorio de Parasitología, Centro de Investigaciones Regionales "Dr Hideyo Noguchi", Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, México.
Maryrose José Escalante-TalaveraLaboratorio de Parasitología, Centro de Investigaciones Regionales "Dr Hideyo Noguchi", Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, México.
Christian Florian Teh-PootLaboratorio de Parasitología, Centro de Investigaciones Regionales "Dr Hideyo Noguchi", Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, México.
María Noe Carrera-CampelloneLaboratorio de Parasitología, Centro de Investigaciones Regionales "Dr Hideyo Noguchi", Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, México.
Pedro Pablo Martinez-VegaLaboratorio de Parasitología, Centro de Investigaciones Regionales "Dr Hideyo Noguchi", Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, México.
Victor Manuel Dzul-HuchimLaboratorio de Parasitología, Centro de Investigaciones Regionales "Dr Hideyo Noguchi", Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, México.
Landy Magaly Pech-PistéLaboratorio de Parasitología, Centro de Investigaciones Regionales "Dr Hideyo Noguchi", Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, México.
Etienne B WaleckxLaboratorio de Parasitología, Centro de Investigaciones Regionales "Dr Hideyo Noguchi", Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, México.
Liliana Estefanía Villanueva-LizamaLaboratorio de Parasitología, Centro de Investigaciones Regionales "Dr Hideyo Noguchi", Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, México.
Jaime Ortega-LopezDepartamento de Biotecnología y Bioingeniería, Centro de Investigación y Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de México, México.
Eric DumonteilDepartment of Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease, and Vector-Borne and Infectious Disease Research Center, Celia Scott Weatherhead School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, United States. edumonte@tulane.edu.
Julio Vladimir Cruz-ChanLaboratorio de Parasitología, Centro de Investigaciones Regionales "Dr Hideyo Noguchi", Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Mérida, México. vladimir.cruz@correo.uady.mx.

Funding

Instituto Carlos Slim de la Salud #87714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dogs play a crucial role in the transmission cycle of Trypanosoma cruzi and their presence in domicile increases the risk of infection in humans. In Yucatán, Mexico previous studies have reported T. cruzi infection in dogs from both rural and urban areas, which we expanded here, to better understand infection dynamics. A total of 186-dogs were screened for T. cruzi infection by PCR and serology. Parasite burden, genotype, immune response, cardiac alterations, and roaming behavior of the dogs were analyzed. The T. cruzi prevalence was 26.8% (50/186). Genotyping of T. cruzi revealed the predominance of TcI parasites, although most dogs (15/25, 60%) harbored mixed infections with additional DTUs including TcII, TcIV, TcV and TcVI. Antibodies against T. cruzi proteins were detected in > 90% of infected dogs, confirming their immunogenicity in natural infections. Mild ECG abnormalities were present in 40% of infected dogs. A logistic model suggested that the interplay between the host responses to multiple parasite strains could mediate differences in disease severity (P = 0.0002, R

Indexed as

Chagas DiseaseDog DiseasesTrypanosoma cruziAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanDogsFemaleGenotypeMaleMexicoPrevalenceRural PopulationAntibodies, ProtozoanChagas diseaseDogsPathogenesisTrypanosoma Cruzi

Identifiers

PMID40133329
PMCPMC11937323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.