ArticleScientific reports2025
Analyzing display photometric features through time-dependent dynamics of accommodative responses and ocular imaging quality.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To optimize screen quality for a better and healthier visual experience, it is essential to understand how photometric parameters impact ocular physiological parameters. However, the relationship between these photometric and physiological parameters has still not been clearly defined. In this study, time series data of accommodative response and ocular imaging quality at various time points during screen viewing were analyzed, examining different screen photometric parameters. The concept of "tolerance duration" based on these time series curves was introduced. The findings indicate that accommodative response is sensitive to screen brightness, while ocular imaging quality is affected by spectral power distribution. The mathematic models of time-dependent dynamics for both accommodative response and ocular imaging quality were developed, consisting of positive and negative forces. The accommodative response displayed an exponential decay and linear increase pattern, whereas the ocular imaging quality corresponded more closely to sigmoid functions. This innovative model could broaden the understanding of ocular physiological changes during screen use. Additionally, it may offer useful insights for optimizing screen photometric parameters and assist in monitoring ocular responses in clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.