Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40133311›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evaluating segmentation methods for UAV-Based Spoil Pile Delineation.

Sureka Thiruchittampalam, Bikram Pratap Banerjee, Nancy F Glenn, Simit Raval

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sureka ThiruchittampalamSchool of Minerals and Energy Resources Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Bikram Pratap BanerjeeSchool of Surveying and Built Environment, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, 4350, Australia.
Nancy F GlennDepartment of Geosciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID, USA.
Simit RavalSchool of Minerals and Energy Resources Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. simit@unsw.edu.au.

Funding

Australian Coal Industry's Research Program C29048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mine waste dumps consist of individual, blob-like spoil piles, each with unique geological and geotechnical attributes that contribute to the overall stability of the dump. Manually characterising these individual spoil piles presents challenges due to issues of accessibility, safety risks, and time consumption. Analysis of remotely acquired images, through object-based classification, offers a promising solution for the effective identification and characterisation of individual spoil piles. However, object-based classification's effectiveness hinges on segmentation, an aspect often overlooked in spoil pile analysis. Therefore, this study aims to identify and compare various segmentation approaches to pave the way for image-based spoil characterisation. A comparative analysis is conducted between traditional segmentation approaches and those rooted in deep learning methodologies. Among the diverse segmentation approaches evaluated, the morphology-based deep learning segmentation approach, Segment Anything Model (SAM), exhibited superior performance compared to other approaches. This outcome underscores the effectiveness of incorporating morphological data and deep learning techniques for accurate and efficient segmentation of spoil pile. The findings of this study provide valuable insights into the optimisation of segmentation strategies, thereby contributing to the application of image-based monitoring of spoil piles and promoting the sustainable and hazard free management of mine dump environments.

Indexed as

Mean shift segmentationSegment anything modelSimple linear iterative clusteringStarDist segmentationVoronoi-based segmentation

Identifiers

PMID40133311
PMCPMC11937277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.