Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40133305›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

Transcriptome and translatome comparison of tissues from Arabidopsis thaliana.

Isabel Cristina Vélez-Bermúdez, Wen-Dar Lin, Shu-Jen Chou, Ai-Ping Chen, Wolfgang Schmidt

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isabel Cristina Vélez-BermúdezInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan. isabel.velez@uniud.it.
Wen-Dar LinInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Bioinformatics Core Lab, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5929-2648
Shu-Jen ChouInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Genomic Technology Core, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan.
Ai-Ping ChenInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Genomic Technology Core, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan.
Wolfgang SchmidtInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan.

Funding

Academia Sinica AS-TP-109-L01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Translation is one of the multiple complementary steps that orchestrates gene activity. In contrast to the straightforwardness of transcriptional surveys, genome-wide profiles of the translational landscape of plant cells remain technically challenging and are thus less well explored. Protein-coding genes are expressed at a variable degree of efficiency, resulting in pronounced discordance among the regulatory levels that govern gene activity. Ribo-Seq is an extremely useful tool for estimating translation efficiency, but the data sets available for plants are limited. Here, we compare inventories of expressed and translated RNA populations, generated by mRNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) and ribosome footprinting (Ribo-Seq) from shoots and roots of Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings. Our data set provides information on the translational fitness of protein-coding mRNAs that may aid in obtaining a comprehensive picture of the regulatory levels governing genes activity across the genome.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisProtein BiosynthesisTranscriptomePlant RootsPlant ShootsRibosomesRNA, MessengerSeedlingsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID40133305
PMCPMC11937538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.