ArticleThe Korean journal of pain2025
The analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of a combined preparation based on the blunt-nosed viper's venom and oregano essential oil.
Article in The Korean journal of pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- More rigorously and more transparently: recommendations for reporting statistical methods.The Korean journal of pain · 2026Article
- Targeting the Gut-Brain Axis with Plant-Derived Essential Oils: Phytocannabinoids and Beyond.Nutrients · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To relieve acute and inflammatory pain, preparations of plant and animal origin have been used. The present work aimed to study the analgesic and anti-inflammatory effectiveness of a combined preparation based on viper venom and essential oil. Determining effective routes of exposure, optimal doses, the duration of action of the preparation, and possible mechanisms of their action were the areas of interest. Methods: Experiments were carried out on murine. Essential oil content was determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry equipment. The formalin, carrageenan, and hot plate tests were used. Certain methods for determining side effects were used as well. To determine the participation of cannabinoid and opioid receptors in the antinociceptive action of combined preparation, SR144528 and naloxone were used. Results: The treatment of the ointment version of the preparation reduced inflammatory pain by more than 68% and decreased the volume of inflammatory edema by up to 36%. The involvement of cannabinoid receptors in the analgesic mechanism of the ointment was approximately 73%, and, for the opioid receptors, about 64%. Physiologically significant side effects were not observed. Conclusions: The active components of the ointment are principally different in their mechanism of action and make it possible to relieve pain and inflammation both through the blockade of pain receptors of afferent nociceptive neurons (venom) as well as via cannabinoid and opioid receptors (essential oil).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.