ArticleBMJ open2025
'They don't squeal, 'Disabled'.': using qualitative interviews to explore user perceptions of 'stylish' grab rails intended to promote healthy ageing in place in England.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis qualitative study seeks to answer the question: How do older adults use and perceive home adaptations, specifically grab rails designed to blend into the home environment and avoid overt associations with disability? The grab rails were provided by a large energy company. They were specifically designed to be discreet, stylish and have a dual purpose, with the aim of supporting healthy ageing through ageing in place.
designA qualitative study using semistructured interviews, with thematic analysis.
settingInterviews were conducted predominantly via telephone calls, between 5 June 2023 and 14 August 2023.
participants33 participants took part in the study with a mean age of 64.2 years. Participants resided in the following regions across the UK: North East, North West, Yorkshire, East and West Midlands. Purposive sampling allowed diversity in gender, ethnicity and home tenure. The grab rails were installed at least 3 months prior to recruitment.
resultsMany participants reported that using the grab rails helped their independence and safety in daily life. The aesthetics of the grab rails were positively appraised, specifically because they had a notably different outward appearance to standard grab rails. Participants were aware that declining mobility can be stigmatising, and they felt the grab rails mitigated this by being discreet and enabling them to present a home which they felt would be accepted by wider society. Participants felt this protected their identity, as they wanted to appear independent to wider society. However, some participants were unaware that the grab rails had been designed with a duality of purpose or were apprehensive towards the functionality of these grab rails. This apprehension may have stemmed from the home adaptations being provided by a large energy provider, or because the discreet design of the grab rails made their intended purpose less overt.
conclusionsWhile home adaptations with a discreet and stylish aesthetic are valued by older people, our findings highlight that there are issues with commodifying home adaptations. Furthermore, we demonstrate the importance of addressing the social stigma associated with ageing-related home adaptations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.