Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40132842›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Transition shock among nursing students during clinical practice: a scoping review protocol.

Xue-Li Jia, Shuang-Shuang Ren, Yang-Yang Huang, Pei-Li Shi, Yu Mi, Miao Zhang, Gui-Yue Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xue-Li Jia *The First Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Shuang-Shuang Ren *The First Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Yang-Yang Huang *The First Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Pei-Li ShiThe First Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Yu MiThe Second Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Miao ZhangDepartment of Nursing, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China zhuguiyueahmu@126.com mm20070317@126.com.
Gui-Yue ZhuThe First Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China zhuguiyueahmu@126.com mm20070317@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9895-875X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTransition shock is a very common negative clinical practice experience for nursing students, which not only makes the adaptation to clinical practice difficult but also influences the smooth transition from nursing students to registered nurses and eventually could lead them to leave the nursing field. Therefore, transition shock of nursing students deserves attention. Recently, there has been a notable increase in research dedicated to transition shock experienced by nursing students. However, the overview of research done on this topic remains unclear. Therefore, we will conduct a scoping review to summarise assessment tools, influencing factors, the impacts and intervention strategies of transition shock among nursing students and identify knowledge gaps in this field to guide further research. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review guidelines to conduct this scoping review. A comprehensive literature search will be conducted through 12 databases and grey literature sources. The search period will be restricted from May 2009 to December 2024, and this review will only incorporate publications in Chinese or English. Two researchers will independently screen the literature according to inclusion criteria, and then conduct data extraction. Any differences arising between the two researchers will be addressed by engaging in discussion with a third researcher. We will collate, summarise and analyse the extracted data and subsequently present the results by means of figures, tables and descriptive narratives. This review will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews reporting checklist. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this review does not involve patients or the public, there is no need for ethical approval. The results of this scoping review will be disseminated by means of conference presentations and publication in a peer-reviewed academic journal. REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/2r6jn/).

Indexed as

Students, NursingHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicNursing researchProtocols & guidelinesPsychological Stress

Identifiers

PMID40132842
PMCPMC11934382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.