ArticleBMJ open2025
Study protocol to redefine muscle attenuation cut-offs for better prediction of mortality in patients with cirrhosis: a comprehensive post hoc validation study - a study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06593015 (Study Protocol to Redefine Muscle Attenuation Cut-offs for Better Prediction of Mortality in Patients With Cirrhosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Study Protocol to Redefine Muscle Attenuation Cut-offs for Better Prediction of Mortality in Patients With Cirrhosis: a Comprehensive Post-hoc Validation Study
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A clinical prediction model for low psoas muscle radiodensity in adults with severe obesity: development and internal validation.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMyosteatosis, characterised by altered muscle composition detectable by muscle radiodensity attenuation on CT scans, has been associated with increased mortality in patients with cirrhosis. However, standard attenuation cut-offs, derived primarily from oncology populations, may not be appropriate for patients with cirrhosis. This study protocol aims to address this diagnostic gap by validating the Ebadi cut-offs, which are based on a retrospective cohort and have not been extensively validated in a cirrhotic population. The aim of the study is to refine these cut-offs for more accurate prediction of mortality in patients with cirrhosis using two independent patient cohorts (retrospective and prospective). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This post hoc validation study analyses muscle weakness cut-offs in patients with cirrhosis using data from two independent cohorts. A total of 1537 patients will be analysed. The study will assess interobserver variability to ensure robust results by analysing random samples of 60 patients from the two cohorts. Statistical methods will be used to determine the accuracy and relevance of current cut-offs in predicting patient mortality. The analysis will also examine the relationship between muscle wasting and clinical outcomes in cirrhosis and the relationship with muscle mass loss. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this study has been obtained from the relevant institutional review boards. The results will be disseminated through presentations at scientific conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals. The results of the study are expected to contribute to improved diagnostic criteria for myosteatosis in cirrhosis, providing clinicians with more tailored and accurate tools for cirrhosis prognosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06593015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.