ArticleBMJ open2025
Students' and educators' perceptions of clinical academic pathways in the UK: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The UK kidney association 2025 academic census: a national survey to identify workforce improvements.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to understand the experiences and perceptions of medical students and medical educators regarding barriers and facilitators for pursuing clinical academic pathways.
designA qualitative study using semistructured interviews and focus groups was conducted. A reflexive thematic analysis was used for data analysis. Theoretical and snowball sampling approaches were applied for participant recruitment.
settingUniversity of Manchester and NHS Trusts in the Greater Manchester region.
participantsThe sample of this study was composed of 43 participants, including medical and dental students, clinical academics, clinicians and stakeholders.
resultsThree themes were identified: Theme 1: Knowledge of the CA pathway; Theme 2: The costs linked to pursuing a clinical academic pathway; Theme 3: Exposure to and time for research.
conclusionsWhile institutions offer opportunities for research experience, there is a need for extended and more tailored opportunities and information, and the overall cost of training for students reduces the attractiveness of the clinical academic pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.