Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40132804›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2025

Catastrophic health payments in Ghana post-National Health Insurance Scheme implementation: an analysis of service-specific health expenditures.

James Akazili, Michel Adurayi Amenah, Lumbwe Chola, Martin Amogre Ayanore, John Ele-Ojo Ataguba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

James AkaziliSchool of Public Health, C K Tedam University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Navrongo, Upper East Region, Ghana.
Michel Adurayi AmenahFaculty of Public Health, Ghana College of Physicians and Surgeons, Accra, Ghana michel.adurayi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0327-0061
Lumbwe CholaBergen Centre for Ethics and Priority, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Martin Amogre AyanoreDepartment of Health Policy Planning and Management, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana.
John Ele-Ojo AtagubaHealth Economics Laboratory, University of Manitoba Faculty of Health Sciences, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGhana implemented several health reforms in the 1970s and 1990s. Still, several access barriers persist, including high out-of-pocket (OOP) spending, which led to the implementation of the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) in 2003 to achieve Universal Health Coverage and lower OOP spending. This study evaluates the incidence and intensity of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) among Ghanaian households post-NHIS, considering OOP health spending on different health services.

methodsData came from the Ghana Living Standards Surveys rounds 6 (2012/2013) and 7 (2016/2017) and the Annual Household Income and Expenditure Survey 2022/2023. Key variables were OOP spending on three health service categories (medical products, outpatient and inpatient) and total expenditure. The incidence and intensity of CHE for various health service categories were calculated using service-specific thresholds. A household incurs CHE for each service when OOP health spending as a share of total expenditure exceeds the service-specific threshold.

resultsOverall, at the 10% threshold, CHE headcount for total OOP health spending increased from 1.26% (95% CI 1.11% to 1.44%) to 11.45% (95% CI 10.86% to 12.07%) between 2012 and 2023. CHE gaps were also substantial for overall and service-specific OOP health spending. Medical supplies account for a large share of total OOP health spending, with CHE headcount rising from 1.34% (95% CI 1.18% to 1.53%) to 12.24% (95% CI 11.64% to 12.89%) between 2012 and 2023 at the 10% original threshold. Although the results were mixed, rural, northern and low-income households experienced substantial financial burdens. At the 20% threshold, the CHE headcount for inpatient services increased from 0.84% (95% CI 0.64% to 1.10%) to 4.38% (95% CI 3.83% to 4.99%) for northern dwellers between 2012 and 2023. DISCUSSION/

conclusionsDespite NHIS coverage, high-cost services like medical supplies, hospital stays and frequently used outpatient services substantially drive CHE in Ghana, particularly for underserved populations. Addressing them requires prioritised policy interventions to expand NHIS coverage for essential services and improve financial protection, especially for rural and low-income households.

Indexed as

Catastrophic IllnessHealth ExpendituresInsurance, Major MedicalNational Health ProgramsDemographyGhanaHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth insurance

Identifiers

PMID40132804
PMCPMC11938226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.