ReviewTalanta2025
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) detection for the identification of bacterial infections in clinical wound samples.
Review in Talanta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Microbial volatile organic compounds and olfactory receptors in wound malodor.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- Volatilomic Profiling of Early-Stage Biotransformation Enables Identification of Diagnostic Volatiles inFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evolving Approaches to Bacterial Identification: A Review of Classical and Modern Techniques.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Revolutionizing Stem Cell Sorting with Machine Learning: A Review of Trends, Tools, and Future Directions.Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2026Review
- Headspace Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Profiling of Infected and Non-Infected Wound Swabs-A Pilot Study.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Untargeted GC-IMS Metabolomics of Wound Headspace for Bacterial Infection Biomarker Discovery.Metabolites · 2026Article
- Stimuli-Responsive Nanomaterial-Based Biosensor Structures for Wound Care: pH, ROS, and Temperature Sensing Strategies.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Innovations to Combat Antibiotic Resistance in Critical Care: Tools for Targeted Therapy and Stewardship.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Non-Invasive Diagnostic Platform for Canine Leishmaniasis Using VOC Analysis and Distributed Veterinary Infrastructure.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early detection of wound infections is critical for timely intervention and prevention of possible complications since prompt treatment can help lower pathogen spread and enhance faster healing. Early detection also helps reduce the risk of serious infections requiring extensive medical interventions or life-threatening diseases such as sepsis. Culture-based approaches currently used for bacterial identification have limited sensitivity and specificity. At the same time, they are time-consuming, resulting in delays in therapy and, therefore, having a negative impact on the treatment outcomes. Quantifying the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released by bacteria residing in wounds is a promising, non-invasive option for detecting infections at early stages. This method allows for continuous monitoring without requiring invasive procedures, thereby reducing patient discomfort and the risk of further complications. Spectroscopy methods and sensors are the primary VOC detection and quantification approaches, but sensors are more rapid, cost-effective, non-invasive, and precise. This review highlights the significance of the early detection of wound infection to enable timely intervention and prevent complications, emphasizing the limitations of culture-based approaches. It also explores the potential of quantifying VOCs using different methods and discusses the correlation between their levels and the rate of bacterial infections in wounds. Additionally, the review evaluates current VOC-based monitoring methods for wound management, identifies gaps in the field, and advocates for further research to advance wound care and enhance patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.