ArticleVaccine2025
Identification of potential vaccines for use with microarray patches in low- and middle-income countries: An assessment from the Vaccine Innovation Prioritisation Strategy Alliance.
Article in Vaccine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global vaccine development.Nature medicine · 2026Review
- Booster Immunisation with Skin-Patch-Delivered Unadjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Vaccine Is Safe and Immunogenic in Healthy Adults.Vaccines · 2025Article
- Advances in Drug and Vaccine Delivery for Low- and Middle-Income Healthcare Programs-The Case for Replacing Multi-Dose Vials with Prefilled Single-Dose Delivery Systems.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMicroarray patches (MAPs) have the potential to increase equitable vaccine coverage in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, MAP developers and vaccine manufacturers have identified a barrier to development of MAPs for global health applications: the need for guidance on which vaccine MAPs would be of value to LMIC immunization programs. To address this gap, the Vaccine Innovation Prioritisation Strategy (VIPS) Alliance conducted a prioritization process to identify high-priority vaccines that could be delivered via MAPs in LMICs.
methodsWe first compiled a reference list of vaccine targets through desk research, then filtered these targets based on route of administration, market distribution, existing interest from a global/regional health organization, whether the vaccine would address a specific global health priority or stakeholder agenda, development status, and potential MAP use cases. To further down-select the list, we consulted an external advisory group and evaluated the potential regulatory pathway, programmatic impact, and financial sustainability to define two priority levels.
resultsFrom a reference list of 91 vaccine targets, we identified 21 with applicability to LMICs, which were further down-selected to a VIPS priority list of 11 vaccine targets grouped by priority level. Priority group 1 included vaccines against hepatitis B virus, measles-rubella/measles-mumps-rubella viruses, human papillomavirus, rabies virus, yellow fever, influenza virus (seasonal and pandemic), and SARS-CoV-2. Priority group 2 included vaccines against Group B streptococcus, Neisseria meningitidis A,C,W,Y,(X), Salmonella Typhi, and Streptococcus pneumoniae.
conclusionsThese vaccine MAP priorities will inform the investment decisions of MAP developers, vaccine manufacturers, donors, and global health partners to better respond to country needs when designing their MAP portfolios. By providing a holistic assessment of the potential drivers for and key risks of developing specific vaccine MAPs, our findings have the potential to promote MAP development activities for vaccines that are priorities for LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.