ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2025
Evaluation of Microfilaremic Individuals after Mass Drug Treatment with Ivermectin, Diethylcarbamazine, and Albendazole for Lymphatic Filariasis in Papua New Guinea.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
After mass drug administration (MDA) for lymphatic filariasis, which involved a single coadministered dose of ivermectin plus diethylcarbamazine and albendazole (IDA), concerns arose regarding individuals who remained microfilaremic. This situation raised questions about the efficacy of the drugs and whether some individuals had not ingested them. In East New Britain Province, Papua New Guinea (PNG), where 81.7% of the population received IDA, 10 individuals were found to have microfilaremia 12 months after the first round of MDA in an area that had a high baseline of microfilaremia (n = 29 microfilariae [Mf] positive pre-MDA). Of these 10 individuals, 7 reported having taken the IDA medication. When Mf detection was repeated 18 months later, all 10 individuals remained Mf positive. Additionally, three more Mf-positive household members were identified, and they also reported taking the IDA. These Mf-positive individuals were then retreated with IDA under direct observation. At 7 and/or 14 months after retreatment, all initially Mf-positive individuals, except for one, were found to be Mf free. Upon further questioning, it was revealed that all but one individual admitted to not taking the initial MDA. Thus, IDA effectively clears Mf in this region of PNG, and the persistent microfilaremia after MDA is primarily because of individuals failing to take the medications as prescribed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.