Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40132187›Full record

ReviewJMIR AI2025

Disease Prediction Using Machine Learning on Smartphone-Based Eye, Skin, and Voice Data: Scoping Review.

Research Dawadi, Mai Inoue, Jie Ting Tay, Agustin Martin-Morales, Thien Vu, Michihiro Araki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Research DawadiArtificial Intelligence Center for Health and Biomedical Research, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3524-1459
Mai InoueArtificial Intelligence Center for Health and Biomedical Research, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3204-1627
Jie Ting TayArtificial Intelligence Center for Health and Biomedical Research, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8385-8649
Agustin Martin-MoralesArtificial Intelligence Center for Health and Biomedical Research, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3564-4776
Thien VuArtificial Intelligence Center for Health and Biomedical Research, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6956-0191
Michihiro ArakiArtificial Intelligence Center for Health and Biomedical Research, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6686-4018

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe application of machine learning methods to data generated by ubiquitous devices like smartphones presents an opportunity to enhance the quality of health care and diagnostics. Smartphones are ideal for gathering data easily, providing quick feedback on diagnoses, and proposing interventions for health improvement.

objectiveWe reviewed the existing literature to gather studies that have used machine learning models with smartphone-derived data for the prediction and diagnosis of health anomalies. We divided the studies into those that used machine learning models by conducting experiments to retrieve data and predict diseases, and those that used machine learning models on publicly available databases. The details of databases, experiments, and machine learning models are intended to help researchers working in the fields of machine learning and artificial intelligence in the health care domain. Researchers can use the information to design their experiments or determine the databases they could analyze.

methodsA comprehensive search of the PubMed and IEEE Xplore databases was conducted, and an in-house keyword screening method was used to filter the articles based on the content of their titles and abstracts. Subsequently, studies related to the 3 areas of voice, skin, and eye were selected and analyzed based on how data for machine learning models were extracted (ie, the use of publicly available databases or through experiments). The machine learning methods used in each study were also noted.

resultsA total of 49 studies were identified as being relevant to the topic of interest, and among these studies, there were 31 different databases and 24 different machine learning methods.

conclusionsThe results provide a better understanding of how smartphone data are collected for predicting different diseases and what kinds of machine learning methods are used on these data. Similarly, publicly available databases having smartphone-based data that can be used for the diagnosis of various diseases have been presented. Our screening method could be used or improved in future studies, and our findings could be used as a reference to conduct similar studies, experiments, or statistical analyses.

Indexed as

health diagnosisliterature reviewmachine learningsmartphone

Identifiers

PMID40132187
PMCPMC11979540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.