Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40132179›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2025

Gender Equality Training for Students in Higher Education: Scoping Review.

Claire Condron, Mide Power, Midhun Mathew, Siobhan Lucey, Patrick Henn, Tanya Dean, Michelle Kirrane Scott, Walter Eppich, Siobhan M Lucey

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Claire CondronRCSI SIM, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8946-4263
Mide PowerDepartment of Sociology, School of Social Sciences and Philosophy, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0009-0006-3398-8352
Midhun MathewRCSI SIM, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-1127-4184
Siobhan LuceySchool of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-3703-0604
Patrick HennSchool of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5958-6163
Tanya DeanConservatoire, Technology University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-9638-0874
Michelle Kirrane ScottRCSI SIM, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-3063-5643
Walter EppichFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Department of Medical Education & Collaborative Practice Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4127-2825
Siobhan M LuceySchool of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-3444-1480

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite recent improvements, gender inequality persists within the higher education sector, as evidenced by the proportionally greater number of student and academic leadership positions occupied by male students and staff. Gender equality education and training for students may help to develop awareness, knowledge, and skills among individual students, building capacity to address biases and accelerate culture change in higher education institutions.

objectiveWe aimed to identify and explore the existing literature on gender equality training interventions for students in tertiary education, with a particular emphasis on training content, methodology, and outcome evaluation.

methodsThe 6-stage framework developed by Arskey and O'Malley was used to map the literature related to current best practice in gender equality training for students in higher education. Systematic database searches of peer-reviewed literature were carried out and 3142 titles, 333 abstracts, and 52 full-text articles were screened for eligibility with 14 (27%) articles selected for inclusion in this review.

resultsThe selected studies detailed a range of pedagogical approaches, including didactic lectures, participatory and co-design workshops, reflective writing, and service-learning, with durations ranging from a single interaction to 1 year. Most articles reviewed did not explicitly state their study aims or research question, and the theoretical underpinnings were generally vaguely described. The longer-term impact of most interventions was unclear, as evaluation metrics seldom go beyond the level of adoption.

conclusionsThis scoping review shows that the literature base for gender equality training for tertiary students lacks coherence, highlighting the need for further work to evaluate its impact. This work provides a foundation for developing training design recommendations.

Indexed as

Gender EquitySexismCurriculumFemaleHumansMaleStudentsgender equalityhigher education institutionsstudentstertiary educationtraining

Identifiers

PMID40132179
PMCPMC12299944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.