Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40132145›Full record

ArticleNeurology2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Predict Cognitive Decline in Alzheimer Disease Clinical Trials.

Bhargav T Nallapu, Kellen K Petersen, Tianchen Qian, Idris Demirsoy, Elham Ghanbarian, Christos Davatzikos, Richard B Lipton, Ali Ezzati, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bhargav T NallapuSaul B. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.ORCID 0000-0001-6368-8509
Kellen K PetersenDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0003-3195-3456
Tianchen QianDepartment of Statistics, University of California Irvine.
Idris DemirsoyDepartment of Computer Science, University in Uşak, Turkey.
Elham GhanbarianDepartment of Neurology, University of California Irvine; and.
Christos DavatzikosRadiology Department, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Richard B LiptonSaul B. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.ORCID 0000-0003-2652-2897
Ali EzzatiDepartment of Neurology, University of California Irvine; and.ORCID 0000-0003-1307-4589
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
Validation of the Remote Cognitive Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease REsearch (R-CARE) Toolbox for Diverse PopulationsR01AG080635 · NIA · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Ali Ezzati, Richard B. LIPTON · 2023 to 2026
$8.6M
Predictive analytics for cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s diseaseK23AG063993 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI EZZATI, ALI · 2020 to 2024
$984k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG063993NIA NIH HHS R01 AG080635NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesAmong the participants of Alzheimer disease (AD) treatment trials, 40% do not show cognitive decline over 80 weeks of follow-up. Identifying and excluding these individuals can increase power to detect treatment effects. We aimed to develop machine learning-based predictive models to identify persons unlikely to show decline on placebo treatment over 80 weeks.

methodsWe used the data from the placebo arm of EXPEDITION3 AD clinical trial and a subpopulation from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Participants in the EXPEDITION3 trial were patients with mild dementia and biomarker evidence of amyloid burden. For this study, participants were identified as those who demonstrated clinically meaningful cognitive decline (CMCD) or cognitively stable (CS) at final visit of the trial (week 80). Machine learning-based classifiers were trained to classify participants into CMCD vs CS groups using combinations of demographics, APOE genotype, neuropsychological tests, and biomarkers (volumetric MRI). The results were developed in 70% of the EXPEDITION3 placebo sample using 5-fold cross-validation. Trained models were then used to classify the participants in an internal validation sample and an external matched sample ADNI

resultsEight hundred ninety-four of the 1,072 participants in the placebo arm of the EXPEDITION3 trial had necessary follow-up data, who were on average aged 72.7 (±7.7) years and 59% female. 55.8% of those participants showed CMCD (∼2 years younger than those without) at the final visit. In the independent validation sample within the EXPEDITION3 data, all the models showed high sensitivity and modest specificity. Positive predictive values (PPVs) of models were at least 11% higher than base prevalence of CMCD observed at the end of the trial. The subset of matched ADNI participants (ADNI DISCUSSION: Our results indicate that predictive models have the potential to improve the design of AD trials through selective inclusion and exclusion criteria based on expected cognitive decline. Such predictive models need further validation across data from different AD clinical trials.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuropsychological TestsPredictive Value of TestsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID40132145
PMCPMC12334344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.