Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40132055›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2025

Effects of Zataria multiflora, Salvia officinalis and Probiotics on Intestinal Microbial Colonization, Immunocompetence, Jejunal Histology and Performance of Laying Hens.

Vahid Khosravi, Amir Hossein Mahdavi, Nasim Hatamzade Esfahani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vahid KhosraviDepartment of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran.
Amir Hossein MahdaviDepartment of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-5456-7625
Nasim Hatamzade EsfahaniDepartment of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medicinal plants and probiotics affect the productive performance of avian species through comparable biological mechanisms, including modifications to the intestinal microbiome, alterations in histomorphology and effects on the immune system and blood metabolites. In light of this, the current study was designed and conducted to compare the efficacy of Zataria multiflora, Salvia officinalis and probiotic microorganisms on some physiological parameters and the performance of laying hens. A total of 225 white leghorn hens aged 42 weeks were randomly assigned into 9 treatments with 5 replicates of 10 birds each. Experimental treatments consisted of a control group, 0.2% and 0.4% Z. multiflora, 0.2% and 0.4% S. officinalis, 0.2% and 0.4% the combination of Z. multiflora and S. officinalis and 0.005% and 0.01% probiotic microorganisms. Our findings showed that dietary inclusion of 0.01% probiotic, 0.4% Z. multiflora and 0.4% Z. multiflora + S. officinalis treatments decreased the intestinal Escherichia coli (p < 0.01) and Salmonella (p = 0.06) enumerations and increased the lamina propria lymphoid follicle diameter (p < 0.01). Feeding 0.4% Z. multiflora, 0.4% Z. multiflora + S. officinalis could enhance the villus height and crypt depth (p < 0.05). Probiotic supplementation decreased crypt depth (p = 0.019) and increased villus height to crypt depth ratio (p < 0.05). Dietary supplementation of 0.4% Z. multiflora and 0.01% probiotic treatments significantly showed the highest antibody titre against the Newcastle disease virus vaccine and the lowest heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (p < 0.05). Over the whole trial period, feeding 0.01% probiotic and 0.4% Z. multiflora treatments could improve the egg production percentage and feed conversion ratio (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the present findings indicate that the dietary administration of 0.4% Z. multiflora and 0.01% probiotic treatments could improve the productive performance of laying hens by strengthening both mucosal and systemic immune functions, as well as improving health indicators related to the intestinal absorptive area.

Indexed as

ChickensGastrointestinal MicrobiomeImmunocompetenceJejunumLamiaceaeProbioticsSalvia officinalisAnimal FeedAnimalsDietDietary SupplementsFemaleRandom Allocationimmunological responsesintestinal histologylaying hensprobioticSalvia officinalisZataria multiflora

Identifiers

PMID40132055
PMCPMC11935993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.