ArticlePloS one2025
Synthetic ECG signal generation using generative neural networks.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synthetic artificial intelligence in cardiology: from generative models to clinical applications.European heart journal open · 2026Review
- Dynamic community detection using class preserving time series generation with Fourier Markov diffusion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Generative Adversarial Networks for Modeling Bio-Electric Fields in Medicine: A Review of EEG, ECG, EMG, and EOG Applications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- CLEP-GAN: an innovative approach to subject-independent ECG reconstruction from PPG signals.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence and Electrocardiography for Cardiovascular Disease Diagnosis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- A Generative Adversarial Network to Synthesize 3D Magnetohydrodynamic Distortions for Electrocardiogram Analyses Applied to Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparison of discrimination and calibration performance of ECG-based machine learning models for prediction of new-onset atrial fibrillation.BMC medical research methodology · 2023Article
- Accurate detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with certified-GAN and neural architecture search.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrocardiogram (ECG) datasets tend to be highly imbalanced due to the scarcity of abnormal cases. Additionally, the use of real patients' ECGs is highly regulated due to privacy issues. Therefore, there is always a need for more ECG data, especially for the training of automatic diagnosis machine learning models, which perform better when trained on a balanced dataset. We studied the synthetic ECG generation capability of 5 different models from the generative adversarial network (GAN) family and compared their performances, the focus being only on Normal cardiac cycles. Dynamic Time Warping (DTW), Fréchet, and Euclidean distance functions were employed to quantitatively measure performance. Five different methods for evaluating generated beats were proposed and applied. We also proposed 3 new concepts (threshold, accepted beat and productivity rate) and employed them along with the aforementioned methods as a systematic way for comparison between models. The results show that all the tested models can, to an extent, successfully mass-generate acceptable heartbeats with high similarity in morphological features, and potentially all of them can be used to augment imbalanced datasets. However, visual inspections of generated beats favors BiLSTM-DC GAN and WGAN, as they produce statistically more acceptable beats. Also, with regards to productivity rate, the Classic GAN is superior with a 72% productivity rate. We also designed a simple experiment with the state-of-the-art classifier (ECGResNet34) to show empirically that the augmentation of the imbalanced dataset by synthetic ECG signals could improve the performance of classification significantly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.