ReviewPloS one2025
Pan-African review of cultural uses of carnivores.
Review in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating synthetic substitutes to reduce illegal harvesting and support species recovery.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
- Combining detection dogs with air extraction methodology to expose wildlife trafficking in containerized cargo.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
- Introduction: advances in small carnivore ecology.Journal of mammalogy · 2026Article
- Fading Roars? A Survey of the Cultural Use and Illegal Trade in Wild Felid Body Parts in Côte d'Ivoire.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The consumptive use of fauna, encompassing the extraction of skins and derivatives, undermines vulnerable species' resilience to persistent offtake. Evidence of pervasive, Africa-wide hunting and trafficking of wildlife underscores the need to understand the drivers and extent of this utilisation and exploitation. Here, we investigated evidence for the cultural use of 33 African carnivore species (Felidae, Viverridae, Nandiniidae, terrestrial Mustelidae) across Africa, a hitherto under-explored consumptive use threat, by conducting a systematic mixed-methods review and analysis of incidence records from nearly 600 published accounts and 555 YouTube videos. Aims were to: (i) characterise the main types of documented cultural uses behind the extraction and trade of selected carnivore taxa and examine the Africa-wide occurrence and extent of these practices; (ii) identify regional and national nexuses of African trade and trafficking; and (iii) explore factors that may perpetuate utilisation of certain species and products. Results for 48 African countries show that traditional use is widespread, including for purposes like attire, zootherapy and bushmeat. The culturally endowed legacy of diverse traditions suggests that these mostly under-reported and unquantified customary practices exist on a spectrum of cultural importance, impact, and extirpation risk for species population decline. Most incidence records were of spotted carnivore skins worn by traditional leaders, healers and participants in thousands of annual cultural events. In particular, leopards serve as prominent symbols of power and are mostly sought after by higher-ranking individuals. Lions are widely used in the attire of royalty, healing practices, and are periodically killed due to human-wildlife conflict with their parts sometimes subsequently removed and used. While most incidence-based records linked larger felids to traditional use, the reporting and impact on smaller spotted carnivores should not be overlooked. Smaller species also hold intrinsic cultural value, including skins for regalia and serving as substitutes for declining larger spotted felids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.