ArticlePloS one2025
Current status of Tele-speech language therapy by type and support for patients with post-stroke aphasia: A scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ORLA combined with telerehabilitation in patients with subacute Poststroke aphasia: a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to classify and analyze trends in the assessment and training methods used in telepractice speech-language therapy (Tele-SLT) for people with aphasia (PWA), according to the type of Tele-SLT (synchronous, asynchronous, or combined). This study particularly aimed to identify gaps that prevent the establishment of Tele-SLT, a field that has gained significant attention post-COVID-19 pandemic.
designA scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. SETTING AND
participantsIncluded were research articles on Tele-SLT for individuals aged 18 years or older diagnosed with post-stroke aphasia. Articles in both English and Japanese were reviewed, using five online databases (Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library, and ICHUSHI Web).
methodsStudies involving Tele-SLT were categorized by support methods, content, study design, and outcomes. The quality of the extracted studies was also assessed. We also assessed the quality of the selected studies and performed a meta-analysis of some of the results.
resultsOf the initial 1,484 articles, 35 met the eligibility criteria. Regarding Tele-SLT support methods, 3 articles (8.57%) focused on assessment methods, while 32 (91.43%) focused on training methods. Fourteen articles (40.00%) employed synchronous Tele-SLT delivery, 20 (57.14%) employed asynchronous delivery, and 1 (2.86%) employed a combined approach. The methodological quality of 27 (77.14%) of the included Tele-SLT articles was rated as 'Low'. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on Tele-SLT demonstrated that asynchronous training was effective for language function. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: This study highlights the need for more research, particularly on remote assessment and synchronous training methods, in Tele-SLT for PWA. Furthermore, this study emphasizes the need for improved research methodologies in this area. To provide high-quality support for PWA who have faced challenges accessing in-person speech-language therapy since the COVID-19 pandemic, further research and development of Tele-SLT implementation guidelines are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.