Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40131979›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Nesting of groups: Links among personal magnetism, community trust, inequality perception and depression.

Peicheng Wang, Yujie Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peicheng WangSchool of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Xuhui District, Shanghai, China.
Yujie ZhangSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Chongqing University, Shapingba District, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6480-4268

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the context of China's rapid transition from a collectivist work-unit system to a more individualized, community-oriented society, this study investigates the relationship between personal magnetism-an individual's social appeal-and its protective role in mitigating depression.

objectiveThis study aims to examine the moderating role of perceived inequality and the mediating effect of community trust in the relationship between personal magnetism and depression.

methodsUtilizing longitudinal data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) from 2018 to 2020, involving 26,711 respondents aged 16 to 96, this study employs multivariate regression models to explore these relationships.

resultsThe findings reveal that perceived inequality amplifies the negative relationship between personal magnetism and depression, suggesting that personal magnetism becomes less effective in alleviating depressive symptoms in contexts of higher inequality. Additionally, community trust is identified as a key mediator, explaining how strong social networks can buffer the psychological effects of inequality and enhance mental well-being.

conclusionThe findings underscore the importance of fostering community trust and addressing income inequality in public policy. By leveraging the positive effects of personal magnetism and social solidarity, targeted interventions can reduce depression and enhance collective well-being in societies undergoing socio-economic transformation.

Indexed as

DepressionTrustAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChinaFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40131979
PMCPMC11936175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.