ArticlePloS one2025
Dosing patterns and dose effects of sacubitril/valsartan: A claims-based retrospective cohort study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prescription Patterns of Sacubitril/Valsartan in an Outpatient Population Diagnosed with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction After a Recent Hospitalization.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe goals of this retrospective cohort analysis were to determine real-world dose and titration patterns of sacubitril/valsartan (SAC/VAL), a heart failure medication, and examine whether dose patterns are associated with healthcare utilization and costs.
methodsAdult health plan members (18-100 years old) who initiated SAC/VAL between 2020 and 2022 and had continuous enrollment 6 months prior to, and at least 3 months following SAC/VAL initiation were identified. Members also had to have 3 months of SAC/VAL fills with good adherence (N = 2,977). Claims data were used to characterize dosage patterns and compare total costs of care, as well as all-cause and heart failure- hospital admissions across those with different terminal SAC/VAL doses.
resultsMost members initiated SAC/VAL at the lowest dose (76%, n = 2,267), of whom few titrated upward by their final fill (31%, n = 703). Overall, only 19% (n = 563) were at target by their final fill. Those ending on higher doses experienced significantly fewer all-cause admissions (incidence rate ratios of 1.52 [SE = .16] to 2.66 [SE = .37]; ps < .001) and incurred significantly lower total costs of care while on SAC/VAL (cost ratios of 1.21 [SE = .06] to 1.48 [SE = .09]; ps < .001).
conclusionMost individuals initiate and remain on the lowest SAC/VAL dose despite guidelines to titrate upward. SAC/VAL dosage is significantly associated with outcomes, with higher doses associated with more clinical and cost benefits. Research is needed to identify barriers to dose titration and to develop interventions for maximal patient benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.