ArticlePloS one2025
Acceptability and feasibility of HIV self-testing integration into publicly-funded HIV prevention services: Perspectives from HIV testing agency staff that provide HIV testing services to sexual and gender minority youth in Philadelphia County.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIncreasing HIV testing among priority populations is a primary strategy of the Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative. In October 2019, the Philadelphia Department of Public Health (PDPH) established a program to distribute publicly-funded HIV self-testing (HIVST) kits to Philadelphia County residents aged 16 years and older.
methodsThrough a community-academic partnership, we used a cross-sectional sequential transformative mixed-methods design to examine perceived organizational factors, opportunities, and challenges to HIVST integration among agency staff at PDPH-funded agencies early in the COVID-19 pandemic due to decreased access to traditional in-person HIV testing services with a focus on agencies whose client populations included sexual and gender minority clients assigned male sex birth aged 13 to 24 years (not the sole population served at each agency). We integrated data from online surveys conducted with HIV testers (test counselors and testing leads), agency leaders (agency leads and directors), and care navigators (n = 42), and semi-structured interviews with HIV testers and agency leaders (n = 11) employed at PDPH-funded agencies.
resultsMany staff were familiar with HIVST (79%), and approximately two-thirds (64%) were likely to encourage HIVST to clients. In interviews, perceived benefits of HIVST integration were increased access to HIV testing, accommodation for client privacy, decreased risk of stigmatizing encounters, and testing program adaptability. Perceived challenges were loss of connection with clients, suboptimal linkage to HIV treatment and prevention services after self-testing, concerns regarding clients' correct use or interpretation of test results, and client preference.
conclusionsAgency staff described HIVST as a useful tool for expanding low-barrier HIV testing services; however, staff foresaw potential implementation challenges. To optimize HIVST as a long-term strategy, resources are needed to increase familiarity and comfort with HIVST and enhance staff's capacity to establish meaningful client connections and link clients to post-test HIV treatment and pre-exposure prophylaxis services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.