ArticlePloS one2025
In vitro cellular interaction of drug-loaded liposomes with 2D and 3D cell culture of U87-MG cell line.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hyaluronic acid-RSC pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Comparison of subcellular trafficking of the low molecular weight protamine (LMWP) fragment in tumor and non-tumor cells.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The distinctive physiological and physical properties of 3D cultures that mimic tumor microenvironments in vivo make them more suitable for assessing the efficacy of drugs and nanoparticles compared to 2D culture models. Therefore, this study aims to examine and contrast how liposomes interact with cell cultures in both 2D and 3D models. Hanging drop technique was used to generate 3D spheroids. Cellular toxicity of Doxorubicin and Doxil®-liposomes was tested using an MTT assay. Cellular uptake of Doxil®-liposomes was investigated in 3D and 2D cell culture models using flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. Finally, migration and invasion assays were used to investigate the Doxil®-liposomes interaction with the two models 2D model and 3D model, respectively. Our findings show that cells were able to form spheroid structures when a specific cell ratio was maintained. Flow cytometry analysis revealed that 2D cells exhibited higher Doxil®-liposome uptake than 3D cells. The data obtained from confocal and fluorescent microscopy supported the findings of the flow cytometry analysis. Furthermore, the MTT assay showed that Doxil®-liposomes induced less metabolic-disruption compared to free Doxorubicin. Our results also demonstrated that Doxil®-liposomes interacted more loosely with the 3D model than 2D cells, which was further confirmed by measurements of the total migration and invasion areas. Therefore, a 3D model replicating the in vivo conditions of tumor structure and extracellular matrix to assess the delivery of liposomal-nanoparticles to spheroids through a collagen matrix can be more informative and recapitulate the in vivo microenvironment than the 2D model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.