Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40131894›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Patterns and temporal trends in canine breakage and scarring in Western Hudson Bay polar bears (Ursus maritimus).

Simonne S Tremblay, David McGeachy, Nicholas J Lunn, Evan S Richardson, Andrew E Derocher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simonne S TremblayDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0009-0003-0811-2728
David McGeachyWildlife Research Division, Science & Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Nicholas J LunnWildlife Research Division, Science & Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Evan S RichardsonWildlife Research Division, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Andrew E DerocherDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

Banrock Station Environmental TrustCanadian Association of Zoos and AquariumsCanadian Wildlife FederationCare for the Wild InternationalChurchill Northern Studies CentreEarth Rangers FoundationEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaHauser BearsIsdell Family FoundationKansas City ZooManitoba Agriculture and Resource Development
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Canines are used by carnivores for prey capture and social interactions but are often damaged. The highly carnivorous polar bear (Ursus maritimus) has a female defence polygyny mating system where males compete for access to females and injuries to males, such as broken canines and cuts, are common. The Western Hudson Bay polar bear subpopulation has declined in abundance in recent decades and shifted from a female-biased to a male-biased adult sex ratio, which may have affected their mating system. We hypothesize that if changes in subpopulation structure have affected the mating system, then canine breakage and scarring may have changed over time. We assessed age- and sex-specific occurrences of canine breakage and scarring in 3493 individuals between 1981-2023 using non-parametric statistical analyses and linear mixed effect models. We found age- and sex-related differences in mean values of breakage and scarring. These injury occurrences increased with age in both sexes and males had greater amounts of both breakage and scarring compared to females. As the only main effect, sampling year was significant and indicated increasing breakage in both sexes over time; however, the top breakage model did not include year, indicating it was not as strong a predictor of breakage and scarring as age or sex. Age, sex, and year were all in the top model for predicting maximum scarring probabilities. We found some evidence that injuries changed over time, suggesting there could be changes to intraspecific interactions, but additional monitoring is needed.

Indexed as

CicatrixSexual Behavior, AnimalUrsidaeAnimalsDogsFemaleMale

Identifiers

PMID40131894
PMCPMC11936232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.