ArticlePloS one2025
Reasonable adjustments for autistic clinicians: A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autistic people experience barriers to accessing healthcare. Autistic clinical professionals may be able to help improve this situation. Previous research, however, has shown that Autistic clinical professionals experience numerous challenges in the workplace. If there is a 'substantial' and 'long-term' negative effect on the person's ability to do normal daily activities, then Autism may be considered a disability under The Equality Act 2010; the jurisdiction of which covers Great Britain. Autistic clinical professionals working in healthcare settings across England, Wales, and Scotland are therefore entitled to reasonable adjustments to aid them in their clinical practice. This is a qualitative study. We recruited 82 Autistic clinical professionals via social media to complete an online survey. Questions broadly explored: 1) the challenges they faced in their clinical workplaces; and 2) the reasonable adjustments that they needed, had, or needed but did not have. Data were analysed quasi-thematically, also drawing on the principles of content analysis. Respondents reported multiple challenges from our analysis, from which we developed 8 themes: gaining and attending employment, reasonable adjustments under the radar, connecting and integrating (specifically, the communication mismatches between Autistic professionals and non-autistic colleagues, and fitting in socially and professionally), executive functioning, change, working environment, working practices/cultures, and the consequences and effects on Autistic clinical professionals). We recommend that Autistic clinical professionals and their employers individually discuss and iteratively revisit the unique combination of reasonable adjustments suitable for each person. In this way, employers may provide equitable workplaces for their staff which will benefit not only them, but their patients, and healthcare as a whole.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.