Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40131791›Full record

SynthesisBJS open2025

Relationship between pancreatic cancer resection rate and survival at population level: systematic review.

Elizabeth B Lockie, Amy Sylivris, Sanjay Pandanaboyana, John Zalcberg, Anita Skandarajah, Benjamin P Loveday

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BJS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth B LockieDepartment of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5223-5958
Amy SylivrisDepartment of General Surgical Specialties, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Sanjay PandanaboyanaHepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Centre, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
John ZalcbergDepartment of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6624-0782
Anita SkandarajahDepartment of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Benjamin P LovedayDepartment of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

The University of Melbourne
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgery combined with chemotherapy provides the best chance of survival in pancreatic cancer. This study investigated whether increasing the resection rate at a population level improves overall survival and modelled the interaction between resection rate, perioperative mortality rate, and population survival.

methodsA systematic review was conducted on studies reporting resection rate and survival outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer at a population level. MEDLINE, Embase and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews were searched up to February 2024. The primary outcome was overall population-level survival. A model for 1-year survival incorporating varying resection and perioperative mortality rates was developed.

resultsThe search identified 3967 studies; 19 were eligible (516 789 patients). A significant association was observed between resection rate and pancreatic cancer population survival at 1 year (r2 = 0.46, P = 0.001). A weak but significant association was noted between resection rate and (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy (r2 = 0.26, P = 0.03). One-year pancreatic cancer population survival was significantly associated with chemotherapy (r2 = 0.63; P = 0.004), but the effect was weaker than for resection rate (regression slope 0.26 versus 0.94 respectively). According to the developed model, for example, increasing the resection rate from 10 to 15% and perioperative mortality rate from 2 to 3% would lead to a 1-year survival increase from 17.6% to 22.1%.

conclusionA higher resection rate at a population level was associated with improved survival of the pancreatic cancer population. While some of this benefit was linked to increasing (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy use, the effect of resection rate was stronger. Strategies to enhance the resection rate at national and regional levels should be explored. Establishing a benchmark for resection rate could support patient-centred healthcare and promote equitable access to high-quality pancreatic cancer care.

Indexed as

PancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantHumansNeoadjuvant TherapySurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID40131791
PMCPMC11934921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.