Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40131768›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in allergy and clinical immunology2025

The allergenic potential of enolases: physiological and pathophysiological insights.

Sandra Pfeiffer, Ines Swoboda

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α-amylase from the genetically modifiedEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sandra PfeifferThe Molecular Biotechnology Section, Department Applied Life Sciences, FH Campus Wien, University of Applied Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Ines Swoboda

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review gives an overview on the current knowledge of the physiological and pathophysiological features of enolases and how these features might contribute to the enzymes' allergenic properties. It summarizes the most recent literature on allergenic enolases and raises questions that need to be answered in the future to gain a better understanding of the role of enolases in allergic diseases. RECENT

findingsThe recent identification of two novel allergenic enolases, from London plane tree and whiff, further supports the uniqueness of this allergen family: the occurrence of enolases in the three major kingdoms of life and the capability to induce allergic symptoms via inhalation, ingestion, and skin contact. SUMMARY: The importance and uniqueness of enolases as allergenic molecules is widely accepted. However, studies linking the biochemical and physiological features of enolases with their potential to induce allergies are still needed. This would contribute to a better understanding about the role of enolases in the induction of allergic diseases, to improve specificity and sensitivity of allergy diagnosis and to further enable the development of patient-tailored prophylactic and therapeutic approaches.

Indexed as

AllergensHypersensitivityAnimalsHumansAllergenscontact allergyenolasesfood allergyrespiratory allergyubiquitous allergens

Identifiers

PMID40131768
PMCPMC12052056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.