Observational studyEuropean geriatric medicine2025
Predictive value of different physical performance assessment methods for falls in older adults: a 3-year longitudinal study in China.
Observational study in European geriatric medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of task-oriented training on balance, gait, and fall in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2026Pooled it
- Baseline five-times sit-to-stand and functional reach were associated with falls in adults aged 50 years and older in Saudi Arabia: a nine-month prospective cohort study.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- Availability and convenience of sarcopenia screening and diagnostic tools in Chinese primary care.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Neuromotor frailty phenotype and fall risk in geriatrics with knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional analysis of physical therapy performance and psychometric outcomes.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to analyze the predictive value of different physical performances including short physical performance battery (SPPB), time-up and go test (TUGT), gait speed (GS), five times sit-to-stand test (FTSST) and handgrip strength (HGS) on the incidence of falls among community-dwelling older adults and to propose the cut-off values for predicting the incidence of falls.
methodsThis 3-year longitudinal observational study continuously recruited community-dwelling older adults in 2018, assessing baseline physical performances and recording fall incidence (at least one fall) after 3 years.
resultsOf the 215 older adults (mean age, 84.0 ± 4.4 years; 123 [57.2%] females) included in this study, 98 (45.6%) fell. After adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidity, decreased SPPB score (odds ratio [OR] = 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.94), increased TUGT time (OR = 1.07, 95% CI, 1.03-1.12), and lower GS (OR = 0.11, 95% CI, 0.03-0.37) were significantly associated with higher risk of fall and had similar predictive values, while the FTSST and HGS were not. To predict the incidence of falls, the areas under the curve for SPPB, TUGT, and GS were 0.71 (95% CI: 0.65-0.77), 0.73 (95% CI: 0.67-0.79), and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.64-0.77), whereas the cut-offs were 7 points, 14.8 s, and 0.75 m/s, according to the Youden index, respectively.
conclusionAs physical performance indicators, SPPB, TUGT, and GS may be more effective in assessing fall risk, and the threshold values proposed in this study can be used as a reference for stratified fall risk management among community-dwelling older residents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40131699What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.