ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2025
The Evolving Guidelines on Fiber Intake for Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease; From Exclusion to Texture Modification.
Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision nutrition for the prevention and management of inflammatory bowel disease.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Review
- One Patient, Two Problems: Applying Short Bowel Syndrome Management Principles in Inflammatory Bowel Disease patients.Current gastroenterology reports · 2026Review
- Mesenteric adipose tissue: from protective gatekeeper to driver of inflammatory bowel disease.Immunometabolism (Cobham, Surrey) · 2026Review
- Mitigating the Adverse Effects of Poor Nutritional Status in the Management of Adult Patients With Crohn's Disease.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Article
- Diet in Ulcerative Colitis: A Narrative Review of Its Role in Pathogenesis and Treatment.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Review
- Nutrition phenotypes in inflammatory bowel disease: emerging concepts and future directions to guide clinical practice.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewFiber restriction has been a long-standing strategy for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), ostensibly to improve symptoms and reduce complications. Fiber though has a well-documented trophic effect on gut barrier defenses and the intestinal microbiome. This report discusses how texture modification may allow the safe and effective provision of much needed fiber to this patient population. RECENT
findingsThe effect of dietary fiber is characterized by maintenance of gut integrity, support of the microbiome, and immune modulation. Low-fiber diets in patients with IBD result in greater dysbiosis, intestinal permeability, and mucosal inflammation. New recommendations from international IBD guidelines now promote texture modification to allow for inclusion of fiber in certain conditions of IBD. For patients flaring with acute inflammation, or those with ileostomy, intestinal stricture, or ileal pouch anastomosis, continued fiber intake with softer textures and mechanical modification should be prioritized when feasible. For patients recovering from surgery, diet advancement should include reintroduction of soluble and insoluble fibers, while those in remission should have little or no dietary restrictions. Texture modification of high fiber foods may be accomplished by a variety of strategies involved in the selection, preparation, and cooking of fruits and vegetables. Greater effort to include dietary soluble and insoluble fiber should result in clinical benefit to the IBD patient, avoiding the adverse consequences of a low-fiber diet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40131665What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.