ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2025
Non-invasive estimation of beat-by-beat aortic blood pressures from electrical impedance tomography data processed by machine learning.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hypotension in perioperative and intensive care settings is a significant risk factor associated with complications such as myocardial infarction and kidney injury thereby increasing perioperative complications and mortality. Continuous blood pressure monitoring is essential, yet challenging due to the invasive nature of current methods. Non-invasive techniques like Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) have been explored but face challenges in accurate and consistent blood pressure estimation. A machine learning (ML) approach was used to predict aortic blood pressures from EIT voltage measurements in landrace pigs. A convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained on a dataset of 75 298 heartbeats, to predict systolic (SAP), mean (MAP), and diastolic arterial pressures (DAP) of individuals whose arterial pressures were unknown to the algorithm. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (3,1) with absolute agreement (ICC) was calculated and the concordance was estimated, comparing reference blood pressure measurements and ML-derived estimates. A risk classification was estimated for the calculated blood pressure as suggested by Saugel et al. 2018. The ML-model demonstrated moderate correlations with invasive blood pressure measurements (ICC for SAP of 0.530, for MAP of 0.563, and for DAP of 0.521.) with a low risk score for 75.8% of the SAP and 64.2% of MAP estimated blood pressures. ML-techniques using EIT-voltages showed promising preliminary results in non-invasive aortic blood pressure estimation. Despite limitations in the amount of available training data and the experimental setup, this study illustrates the potential of integrating ML in EIT signal processing for real-time, non-invasive blood pressure monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.