Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40131657›Full record

ReviewJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025

Fear of cancer recurrence interventions for breast cancer survivors in the 2020s: a systematic review.

Yoonjung Kim, Hye Young Min, Hae Jeong An

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yoonjung KimSchool of Nursing and Research Institute of Nursing Science, Hallym University, 1 Hallymdaehak-GilGangwon-Do, Chuncheon, 24252, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0104-3865
Hye Young MinCollege of Nursing, Ewha Womans University, 109 Hellen Hall, 52, Ewhayeodae-Gil, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03760, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0793-8718
Hae Jeong AnCollege of Nursing, Ewha Womans University, 109 Hellen Hall, 52, Ewhayeodae-Gil, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03760, Republic of Korea. hjan2122@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2484-2216

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study explored recent trends in the fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) intervention among breast cancer survivors (BCSs) from January 2020 to December 2024 to provide up-to-date evidence that can guide future care improvements.

methodsA systematic review was conducted using a predefined search strategy for studies published in RISS, DBPIA, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science up to December 5, 2024. The titles and abstracts were screened, and full-text reviews and data extraction were completed. Data extracted included participant characteristics, intervention details, and outcomes. The study quality was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools.

resultsThis review analyzed 12 FCR intervention programs involving 895 BCSs. Various interventions, including cognitive behavioral therapy and mindfulness therapy, were implemented. Programs differed in frequency, duration, and delivery mode, with six delivered online and six offline. The follow-up period ranged from 4 to 24 weeks. Ten studies reported significantly lower FCR in the intervention groups than in the control groups, with FCR scores reducing over time relative to baseline.

conclusionsThis review demonstrated the effectiveness of psychological interventions in reducing FCR and highlights the need for tailored, adaptable approaches incorporating online and offline delivery methods. Healthcare providers play a crucial role in delivering these interventions, and adequate training in evidence-based strategies is essential for optimizing outcomes. Standardized protocols and structured follow-up strategies are necessary for sustaining long-term benefits. Future research should explore long-term impacts and establish adherence criteria to optimize intervention feasibility. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Established and non-traditional interventions, including CBT, mindfulness-based interventions, ACT, and CALM, can help BCSs manage FCR. Interventions delivered through online and offline formats improve accessibility, while structured follow-up strategies enhance adherence and support long-term benefits. Survivor-centered care through tailored strategies can sustain long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

Breast cancerCancer survivorsFear of cancer recurrencePsychosocialQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID40131657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.