Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40131649›Full record

SynthesisMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2025

Gastrointestinal perforation in general oncology, metastatic colorectal cancer, and metastatic melanoma population.

Arun Parashar, Vineet Mehta, Varsha Sharma, Muskan Thakur

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arun ParasharSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Solan, H.P., India. arunnittyparashar@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1007-4997
Vineet MehtaDepartment of Pharmacology, Govt. College of Pharmacy, Rohru, H.P., India.
Varsha SharmaMilitary Nursing Services, Indian Army, New Delhi, India.
Muskan ThakurSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Solan, H.P., India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) is a rare and potentially fatal adverse event of antineoplastic therapy. GIP is a rare but serious complication in oncology patients, often leading to significant morbidity and mortality. In general oncology patients, the incidence of GIP ranged from 0.5 to 1.9%. A meta-analysis of six clinical trials with 4579 patients reported an incidence of 1.0%. Among mCRC patients, the incidence varied between 0.5 and 2.4%, with geographic differences-1.5% in the USA and 2.4% in Australia. For metastatic melanoma patients, the incidence of GIP ranged from 0.4 to 0.67%, with U.S. rates of 0.57% and 0.67% and a lower rate of 0.40% reported in Germany. The findings suggest that the risk of GIP varies significantly across oncology populations and treatment regimens, with higher risks noted in metastatic cancer patients undergoing therapies such as VEGF inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors. These data highlight the need for careful monitoring and early intervention in high-risk populations to reduce the impact of GIP on patient outcomes. This systematic review aims to summarize the incidence of GIP in general oncology, metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), and metastatic melanoma (MM) populations. A literature search was conducted in Embase and Medline databases from January 1, 2011 to August 30, 2017, identifying relevant studies on GIP incidence.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsColorectal NeoplasmsIntestinal PerforationMelanomaHumansIncidenceNeoplasm MetastasisAntineoplastic AgentsColorectal cancerGastrointestinal perforationMetastatic melanomaOncology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.