Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40131626›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025

Survival and Metastatic Lymph Node Patterns in Gastric Carcinoma with Exocrine and Neuroendocrine Components.

Hu Ren, Penghui Niu, Zefeng Li, Xiaojie Zhang, Chongyuan Sun, Zelin Wen, He Fei, Zheng Li, Susheng Shi, Yingtai Chen and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hu Ren *Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Penghui Niu *Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zefeng Li *Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xiaojie ZhangGastrointestinal Surgery Department, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chongyuan SunDepartment of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zelin WenDepartment of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
He FeiDepartment of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Zheng LiDepartment of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Susheng ShiDepartment of Pathology, Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. shishusheng@sina.com.
Yingtai ChenDepartment of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. yingtaichen@126.com.
Dongbing ZhaoDepartment of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. dbzhao2003@sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastric carcinoma with coexisting exocrine and neuroendocrine components (GC-EN) is a rare and aggressive subtype of gastric cancer that presents unique challenges in diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. The effect of lymph node metastasis with different components on survival in patients with GC-EN is unknown. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis retrospective study included 98 patients diagnosed with GC-EN at the China National Cancer Center between January 2004 and December 2020. GC-EN was classified into NEC-dominant, mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC), and AC-dominant based on the proportion of adenocarcinoma (AC) and neuroendocrine (NEC) components. Additionally, lymph nodes were categorized into NEC, AC, and MANEC types based on cellular composition.

resultsOf the 98 patients, 30 developed NEC-dominant type, 39 (39.8%) developed MANEC type, and 29 (29.6%) developed AC-dominant type. Additionally, 72.48% of the patients developed lymph node metastasis. The incidence rates of lymph node metastasis were significantly higher among patients with the NEC-dominant (76.6%, 23/30) and MANEC types (74.3%, 29/39) than among those with the ACC-dominant type (65.5%, 19/29; P < 0.05). Pathological T stage was a key factor influencing lymph node metastasis of NEC components in patients with GC-EN. Survival analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis significantly worsened the prognosis of patients with GC-EN (P < 0.05). Analysis of lymph node metastasis with different components on prognosis revealed that patients with GC-EN with lymph node metastasis of NEC components were associated with a significantly poorer prognosis than those without lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio 2.341, 95% confidence interval 1.125-4.871, P = 0.023), while patients with GC-EN with lymph node metastasis of MANEC and AC components exhibited no significant statistical differences. A new N staging system was developed on the basis of the number and different compositions of lymph node metastasis. The new N staging system demonstrated a higher C-index than the AJCC N staging system (0.739 vs. 0.719).

conclusionsLymph node metastasis of NEC components is significantly associated with a poorer prognosis in patients with GC-EN. This study proposes a new N staging system that integrates lymph node count and components, potentially facilitating prognostic stratification and personalized treatment for patients with GC-EN.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineLymph NodesStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateGC-ENLymph nodes metastaticN staging systemSurvival

Identifiers

PMID40131626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.