Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40131552›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2025

The spread of antimicrobial resistance in the aquatic environment from faecal pollution: a scoping review of a multifaceted issue.

Calum Cheung, Patrick J Naughton, James S G Dooley, Nicolae Corcionivoschi, Cathy Brooks

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Calum CheungNutrition Innovation Centre for Food & Health (NICHE), School of Biomedical Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, UK.
Patrick J NaughtonNutrition Innovation Centre for Food & Health (NICHE), School of Biomedical Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, UK.
James S G DooleyNutrition Innovation Centre for Food & Health (NICHE), School of Biomedical Sciences, Ulster University, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, UK.
Nicolae CorcionivoschiFood Hygiene Unit, Bacteriology, Veterinary Sciences Division, Agri-Food Biosciences Institute (AFBI), Veterinary Sciences Division, BT4 3SD, Belfast, Main, UK.
Cathy BrooksFood Hygiene Unit, Bacteriology, Veterinary Sciences Division, Agri-Food Biosciences Institute (AFBI), Veterinary Sciences Division, BT4 3SD, Belfast, Main, UK. cathy.brooks@afbini.gov.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global health concern accelerated by the misuse and mismanagement of antibiotics in clinical and veterinary settings, leading to longer treatment times, increased costs and greater mortality rates. The environment can play a major role as a source and disseminator of AMR, with faecal pollution, from both anthropogenic and non-anthropogenic sources making a significant contribution. The review aimed to identify how faecal pollution contributes to AMR in surface water, focusing on current methods of source tracking faecal pollution. The databases used were Medline Ovid® and Scopus. From the search, 744 papers from January 2020 to November 2023 were identified, and after the screening, 33 papers were selected that reported on AMR, aquatic environments and faecal pollution and were published in English. The studies were from six different continents, most were from Europe and Asia indicating faecal pollution is influenced by spatiotemporal differences such as population and sanitation infrastructure. Multiple different methodologies were used with a lack of standardised methods making comparability challenging. All studies identified AMR strains of faecal indicator bacteria showing resistance to a wide variety of antibiotics, particularly beta-lactams and tetracyclines. Few studies investigated mobile gene elements with class 1 integrons being the most frequently studied. Wastewater treatment plants were significant contributors, releasing large amounts of AMR bacteria into the environment. Environmental factors such as seasonal differences, temperature, rainfall and UV exposure, along with local antibiotic usage influenced the local resistome. Animals, both wild and domestic, introduced antimicrobial resistance genes and potential pathogens into the aquatic environment. Overall, faecal pollution is a complicated issue with multiple factors contributing to and facilitating the spread of AMR. Standardisation of methods and surveillance, robust wastewater management and further research into AMR dissemination are needed to address the human health, animal health and environmental concerns.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialDrug Resistance, MicrobialEnvironmental MonitoringFecesWater MicrobiologyWater PollutionAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial resistanceAntimicrobial resistance genesMobile gene elementsWastewater treatment plant

Identifiers

PMID40131552
PMCPMC11937110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.