ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Evaluation of the efficacy of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine additional and booster doses in immunocompromised patients with multiple sclerosis: the COVACiMS study.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies evaluating COVID-19 primary vaccination with two vaccines reported a blunt response in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients under anti-CD20 and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) modulators. An extended primary vaccination (EPV) was recommended in immunosuppressed MS patients. Data on the effectiveness of the EPV and subsequent booster dose are limited. A prospective cohort study (n = 270) was conducted to evaluate the humoral and cellular immunogenicity of the EPV scheme in immunocompromised MS patients (i.e., treated with anti-CD20, S1P modulators, natalizumab, teriflunomide, or dimethyl fumarate) vs. regular primary vaccination in non-treated patients - primary course (PC) cohort. The effect of a subsequent booster dose was also assessed - first booster (FB) cohort . The seroconversion rates were 55% and 56% in anti-CD20 and 75% and 67% in S1P modulators group in PC and FB cohort, respectively, and 100% in the remaining groups. A positive SARS-CoV-2 Spike T-spot was observed in 22% of patients under S1P modulators in PC cohort and 67% in FB cohort; the remaining groups had 75% or more. Similar rates of breakthrough infection were observed in both groups vs. controls. Compared to non-treated MS patients, immunosuppressed patients under anti-CD20 and S1P modulators drugs receiving EPV scheme or booster dose still present lower protection rates to SARS-CoV-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.