ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025
Incidence and risk factors of biliary leaks after partial hepatectomy within an enhanced recovery perioperative pathway: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between clinically relevant antibiotic-resistant biliary colonization and liver-specific complications following perihilar cholangiocarcinoma resection.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Observational
- Article
- Risk Factors and Strategies for Failure to Rescue Following Hepatectomy: A Review.Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBiliary leak is a specific and frequent complication after hepatectomy. This study aimed to assess the incidence and risk factors of biliary leak after hepatectomy.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was performed. All consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomy between January 2013 and June 2022 were included. Abdominal drainage was performed in case of biliary anastomosis or major hepatectomy. Biliary leak was defined and classified according to the International Study Group for Liver Surgery definition with grades A, B, C based on the required management. Logistic binary regression was used to find risk factors.
resultsData were collected from 565 patients who underwent hepatectomy during the study period. Biliary leaks occurred in 10% (55/565) of patients. The rates of biliary leak grades A, B, and C were 18% (10/55), 37% (20/55), and 45% (25/55), respectively. A high nutrition risk screening (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.4), preoperative biliary drainage (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.5-13.5), and intraoperative biliary anastomosis (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.3-8.9) were found as independent risk factors for biliary leak on multivariable analysis. In terms of morbidity, biliary leak patients had more infectious complications (46% vs. 8%, p < 0.001) and a longer median hospital stay (26 vs. 7 days, p < 0.001). Regarding treatment, 41 (75%) patients with biliary leak underwent drainage either endoscopically or percutaneously.
conclusionPreoperative biliary drainage, high nutrition risk screening, and intraoperative biliary anastomosis were independent predictive factors for postoperative biliary leaks. Most frequent treatments of biliary leaks after hepatectomy were antibiotics and drainage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.