Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40131465›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biometeorology2025

Modelling microclimatic variability in Andean forests of northern Patagonia.

Jonas Fierke, Birgitta Putzenlechner, Alois Simon, Juan Haridis Gowda, Ernesto Juan Reiter, Helge Walentowski, Martin Kappas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biometeorology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jonas FierkeInstitute of Geography, University of Goettingen, Goldschmidtstraße 3, 37077, Goettingen, Germany. jonas.fierke@uni-goettingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6794-8310
Birgitta PutzenlechnerInstitute of Geography, University of Goettingen, Goldschmidtstraße 3, 37077, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5663-581X
Alois SimonFaculty of Resource Management, University of Applied Science and Art, Daimlerstraße 2, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6718-7354
Juan Haridis GowdaINIBIOMA, Universidad Nacional del Comahue-CONICET, Quintral 1250, Bariloche, 8400, Argentina.
Ernesto Juan ReiterAlbrecht-von-Haller-Institute for Plant Science, University of Goettingen, Untere Karspüle 2, 37073, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7737-1527
Helge WalentowskiFaculty of Resource Management, University of Applied Science and Art, Daimlerstraße 2, 37075, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0794-8377
Martin KappasInstitute of Geography, University of Goettingen, Goldschmidtstraße 3, 37077, Goettingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Information on microclimatic conditions beneath canopies is key to understanding small-scale ecological processes, especially concerning the response of biodiversity to climate change. In north-western Patagonia, where data on climate-driven species distribution are scarce, our study provides valuable insights by providing microclimatic models covering spatiotemporal dynamics at 30 × 30 m resolution. Applying in-situ data from 2022 to 2024, we employed a random forest-based regression to assess the impact of several biophysical predictor variables describing terrain and vegetation properties on four microclimatic response variables at three vertical levels within forests. We also interpolated this data spatiotemporally, using statistical downscaling of ERA5 data. Our analysis reveals that the influence of the predictor variables varies strongly by month and response variable. Moreover, significant variability was observed between the models and months regarding their explanatory power and error range. For instance, the model predicting maximum air temperature at a 2 m height achieved an R² of 0.88 and an RMSE of 1.5 °C, while the model for minimum air temperature resulted in an R² of 0.73 and an RMSE of 1.8 °C. Our model approach provides a benchmark for spatiotemporal projections in this data-scarce region, aligned with the climate normal from 1981 to 2010. Future refinement could benefit from data on snow cover, land use and land cover, soil, as well as structural information on vegetation over an extended period, to enhance the dynamical aspects of microclimatic modelling. We are confident that our present model will substantially enhance possibilities to analyse species distribution across vegetation types and terrain-related features within the area.

Indexed as

Climate ModelsForestsMicroclimateArgentinaClimate ChangeTemperatureForestsMicroclimateRandom forest-based regressionRemote sensingStatistical downscaling

Identifiers

PMID40131465
PMCPMC12141355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.