ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2026
Investigating the fluid and electrolyte prescribing knowledge of Foundation Year doctors.
Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sink or swim: Making sense of the NICE intravenous fluid guidelines as a Foundation Year Doctor.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChanges to the medical curriculum have been advocated to improve knowledge on fluid and electrolytes. We aimed to determine the contemporary level of knowledge of trainee doctors on different aspects of fluid and electrolyte prescribing.
methodsAn online survey was distributed to Foundation Year doctors working throughout the United Kingdom. The first part determined demographic information, where participants studied and currently work, and probed their perceptions of their knowledge on fluid and electrolytes. The second part tested knowledge on a wide variety of aspects of fluid and electrolyte management using 20 multiple-choice questions.
resultsIn total, 190 responses were received. Trainee doctors remain responsible for much of the fluid and electrolyte management of patients, and often practise independently. Overall, the average 'score' of each respondent was suboptimal (52%), with no significant difference found between doctors in the first or second year of postgraduate medical practice. Many participants were unable to correctly identify the components of common intravenous fluid products. Understanding of daily electrolyte requirements was also demonstrated poorly, although most showed a good understanding of the daily requirements of water and glucose. The amount of time in medical school allocated to the topic remains low, as do doctors' confidences in their abilities to prescribe fluid and electrolytes.
conclusionsKnowledge surrounding fluid and electrolyte prescribing remains suboptimal, and Foundation Year doctors are frequently undertaking this responsibility independently. These findings reflect previous research performed over the past 20 years, and little improvement appears to have been made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.