ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2025
Incomplete concordance between laboratory and pathologic findings on post-induction kidney biopsy in pediatric patients with proliferative lupus nephritis.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond treatment adjustment: clinical utility of repeat kidney biopsy in pediatric IgA vasculitis nephritis.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- Childhood-Onset Lupus Nephritis in the Era of Triple Therapy and Steroid Minimization.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Assessing kidney outcomes in childhood-onset lupus nephritis: role of National Institutes of Health-modified histological indices.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProliferative lupus nephritis (LN) is associated with increased risk of progression to kidney failure. After initial kidney biopsy, the utility and timing of subsequent biopsies is unknown. There is known discordance between the laboratory parameters used to diagnose LN and the histopathologic classification. We explore the utility of a subsequent kidney biopsy in guiding treatment of LN to determine the factors that warrant follow-up kidney biopsy.
methodsWe conducted a single center retrospective cohort study of 30 SLE patients who underwent serial kidney biopsy for LN. Subjects were stratified based on their Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) renal response into complete renal response (CRR) and incomplete renal response (IRR) groups at the time of second biopsy.
resultsAmong 30 patients with LN, 11/18 in CRR group and 11/12 in IRR group had persistent proliferative nephritis at 1 ± 0.3 years after initial biopsy. Only SLEDAI score was associated with an increased risk of persistent proliferative nephritis (p = 0.03). Initial CARRA response category was associated with outcome at last follow-up (mean 4.5 years), with 11/18 CRR and 3/12 IRR achieving CRR at last follow-up at mean 4.5 years (p < 0.001). Kidney biopsy directly impacted clinical decision in 7/18 CRR patients in the CRR group who had therapy escalated or reduction withheld due to biopsy findings.
conclusionsAvailable laboratory markers in LN are insufficient to identify children with ongoing proliferative nephritis. Follow-up kidney biopsy may be warranted for children with CRR at 1 year after initial biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.