ArticleNeuroradiology2025
Improving differentiation of hemorrhagic brain metastases from non-neoplastic hematomas using radiomics and clinical feature fusion.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic Performance of Deep Learning and Radiomics in Extracranial Carotid Plaque Detection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Research progress in imaging detection of brain metastases.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to develop and validate a fusion model combining multi-sequence MRI radiomics and clinico-radiological features to distinguish hemorrhagic brain metastasis covered by hematoma (HBM.cbh) from non-neoplastic intracranial hematomas (nn-ICH).
methodsThe data of 146 patients with pathologically or clinically proven HBM.cbh (n = 55) and nn-ICH (n = 91) were collected from two clinical institutions. Radiomics features were extracted from various regions (hemorrhage and/or edema) based on T2-weighted, T1-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery, and T1 contrast-enhanced imaging. Synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE) was performed to balance the minority group (HBM.cbh). Logistic regression (LR) and k-nearest neighbors (KNN) were utilized to construct the models based on clinico-radiological factors (clinical model), radiomic features from various modalities of MRI (radiomics model), and their combination (fusion model). The area under the curve (AUC) values of different models on the external dataset were compared using DeLong's test.
resultsThe 4-sequence radiomics model based on the entire region performed the best in all radiomics models, with or without SMOTE, where the AUCs were 0.83 and 0.84, respectively. The AUC of clinical mode was 0.71 with SMOTE, and 0.62 without SMOTE. The fusion model demonstrated excellent predictive value with or without SMOTE (AUC: 0.93 and 0.90, respectively), outperforming both the radiomics and clinical model (0.93 vs. 0.83, 0.71, p < 0.05 and 0.90 vs. 0.84, 0.62, p < 0.05, respectively).
conclusionsThe multi-sequence radiomics model is an effective method for differentiating HBM.cbh from nn-ICH. It can yield the best diagnostic performance prediction model when combined with clinico-radiological features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40131431What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.