Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40131431›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2025

Improving differentiation of hemorrhagic brain metastases from non-neoplastic hematomas using radiomics and clinical feature fusion.

Linyang Cui, Luyue Yu, Sai Shao, Liping Zuo, Hongjun Hou, Jie Liu, Wenjun Zhang, Ju Liu, Qiang Wu, Dexin Yu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Linyang CuiQilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Luyue YuThe School of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Qingdao, China.
Sai ShaoShandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Liping ZuoQilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Hongjun HouWeihai Central Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, Weihai, China.
Jie LiuWeihai Central Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, Weihai, China.
Wenjun ZhangWeihai Central Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, Weihai, China.
Ju LiuThe School of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Qingdao, China.
Qiang WuThe School of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Qingdao, China.
Dexin YuQilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China. yudexin0330@sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to develop and validate a fusion model combining multi-sequence MRI radiomics and clinico-radiological features to distinguish hemorrhagic brain metastasis covered by hematoma (HBM.cbh) from non-neoplastic intracranial hematomas (nn-ICH).

methodsThe data of 146 patients with pathologically or clinically proven HBM.cbh (n = 55) and nn-ICH (n = 91) were collected from two clinical institutions. Radiomics features were extracted from various regions (hemorrhage and/or edema) based on T2-weighted, T1-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery, and T1 contrast-enhanced imaging. Synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE) was performed to balance the minority group (HBM.cbh). Logistic regression (LR) and k-nearest neighbors (KNN) were utilized to construct the models based on clinico-radiological factors (clinical model), radiomic features from various modalities of MRI (radiomics model), and their combination (fusion model). The area under the curve (AUC) values of different models on the external dataset were compared using DeLong's test.

resultsThe 4-sequence radiomics model based on the entire region performed the best in all radiomics models, with or without SMOTE, where the AUCs were 0.83 and 0.84, respectively. The AUC of clinical mode was 0.71 with SMOTE, and 0.62 without SMOTE. The fusion model demonstrated excellent predictive value with or without SMOTE (AUC: 0.93 and 0.90, respectively), outperforming both the radiomics and clinical model (0.93 vs. 0.83, 0.71, p < 0.05 and 0.90 vs. 0.84, 0.62, p < 0.05, respectively).

conclusionsThe multi-sequence radiomics model is an effective method for differentiating HBM.cbh from nn-ICH. It can yield the best diagnostic performance prediction model when combined with clinico-radiological features.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsHematomaIntracranial HemorrhagesMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedCerebral HemorrhageContrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaHemorrhagic brain metastasisMRINon-neoplastic intracranial hematomaRadiomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.