Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2025
Prevalence and Predictors of Anal Sphincter Injuries in Primipara with Vacuum-Assisted Deliveries.
Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisWomen undergoing a vacuum-assisted (VA) delivery are at an increased risk of experiencing an obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). Studies using three-dimensional-endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) have shown that not all OASIs are recognized immediately postpartum. In primipara with VA deliveries, the presence of and the potential clinical implications of undetected OASIs are undetermined and consequently, we examined prospectively a 1-year cohort of this population. We hypothesized that the total rate of OASIs would be higher than the clinically reported rates and wanted to identify potential associated predictors.
methodsThe participants were examined 10-14 days postpartum with 3D-EAUS. Two experienced examiners, blinded to the clinical data, rated the results. The primary outcome was the combined rate of clinically recognized OASIs and clinically unrecognized ultrasound anal sphincter injuries. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odds ratios for selected variables.
resultsOf 334 eligible women, 271 (81%) were included. The total rate of OASIs was 19% (95% CI 14-24; 14% clinically recognized and 5% clinically unrecognized). Prolonged second-stage/maternal exhaustion, occiput posterior presentation, and birthweight ≥ 4000g were significant and independent risk factors, increasing the odds two- to three-fold. The indication fetal distress alone or in combination with others significantly reduced the odds.
conclusionsAbout 1 in 5 primipara undergoing a VA delivery experienced an OASI and about one quarter of them were not recognized clinically. The VA procedure is a modifiable intervention, and the identified risk and protective factors may help clinicians to decide whether it should be performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40131423What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.