Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40131312›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2025

A review of neural networks for metagenomic binning.

Jair Herazo-Álvarez, Marco Mora, Sara Cuadros-Orellana, Karina Vilches-Ponce, Ruber Hernández-García

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Microbial Omics.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jair Herazo-ÁlvarezDoctorado en Modelamiento Matemático Aplicado, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Maule 3480564, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-5479-3366
Marco MoraLaboratory of Technological Research in Pattern Recognition (LITRP), Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Maule 3480564, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-3619-2561
Sara Cuadros-OrellanaLaboratory of Technological Research in Pattern Recognition (LITRP), Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Maule 3480564, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-0602-7867
Karina Vilches-PonceLaboratory of Technological Research in Pattern Recognition (LITRP), Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Maule 3480564, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-7689-1696
Ruber Hernández-GarcíaLaboratory of Technological Research in Pattern Recognition (LITRP), Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Maule 3480564, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-9311-1193

Funding

Fondequip EQM210185National Agency for Research and Development 2022-21221825
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the main goals of metagenomic studies is to describe the taxonomic diversity of microbial communities. A crucial step in metagenomic analysis is metagenomic binning, which involves the (supervised) classification or (unsupervised) clustering of metagenomic sequences. Various machine learning models have been applied to address this task. In this review, the contributions of artificial neural networks (ANN) in the context of metagenomic binning are detailed, addressing both supervised, unsupervised, and semi-supervised approaches. 34 ANN-based binning tools are systematically compared, detailing their architectures, input features, datasets, advantages, disadvantages, and other relevant aspects. The findings reveal that deep learning approaches, such as convolutional neural networks and autoencoders, achieve higher accuracy and scalability than traditional methods. Gaps in benchmarking practices are highlighted, and future directions are proposed, including standardized datasets and optimization of architectures, for third-generation sequencing. This review provides support to researchers in identifying trends and selecting suitable tools for the metagenomic binning problem.

Indexed as

MetagenomeMetagenomicsNeural Networks, ComputerDeep LearningHumansMachine LearningMicrobiotabinningclassificationclusteringdeep learningmetagenomicsneural networks

Identifiers

PMID40131312
PMCPMC11934572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.