Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40130840›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2025

Product formulation and rubbing time impact the inactivation of enveloped and non-enveloped virus surrogates by foam-based hand sanitizers.

Francis Torko, Kristen E Gibson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Francis TorkoDepartment of Food Science, Center for Food Safety, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.
Kristen E GibsonDepartment of Food Science, Center for Food Safety, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4071-7914

Funding

USDA | National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) 2020-67017-32427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective hand hygiene, such as hand washing and hand sanitizer use, is crucial in reducing infectious disease transmission via the hands. The efficacy of hand washing has been well-documented; however, relatively less is known regarding foam-based hand sanitizer efficacy, which is considered an effective alternative to washing hands with soap and water. Hand sanitizers are recommended by both the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization when the hands are not visibly dirty or greasy. This study examined the efficacy of five commercially available foam hand sanitizers-four alcohol-based and one non-alcohol-based-against enveloped and non-enveloped viruses using bacteriophage phi6 (Φ6) and bacteriophage MS2 as surrogates, respectively. A cocktail of MS2 and Φ6 (8 log PFU/mL) was inoculated on the hands and exposed to 3 or 6 mL of hand sanitizer product followed by rubbing the palmar surface of the hands together for 10 s or until dry. The results showed significant log reduction among the virus surrogates (

Indexed as

Bacteriophage phi 6DisinfectantsHand DisinfectionHand SanitizersLevivirusVirus InactivationHandHand HygieneHumansTime FactorsDisinfectantsHand Sanitizersefficacyfoam hand sanitizerformulationhand hygienerubbing time

Identifiers

PMID40130840
PMCPMC12016521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.